Skip to main content | Access Keys | Site Map
The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames homepage
The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames homepage
BROWSE
      Equality Impact Assessment - Grants for Voluntary Organisations

 

Equality Impact Assessment - Grants for Voluntary Organisations

Name of the policy, service or project

Grants to Voluntary organisations

Is this policy new or existing?

Existing

When was it last reviewed?
2002

Directorate

Chief Executives

A. Preparation

The work on this section should be done in advance and be used as part of your EQIA.  Please attach examples of available monitoring information, research and consultation reports.

1. Do you have monitoring data available on the number of people who are using or impacted upon by your policy, service or project?   Yes   No  
Number of people with disabilities?   X    
Black and minority ethnic communities   X    
Women and Men   x    

If you have answered ‘Yes’ to the above questions your monitoring data should be compared to the current available census data to see whether a proportionate number of people are taking up your service.

2. If monitoring has NOT been undertaken, will this be done in the future? (Race Relations Amendment Act 2000)

If so, specify the arrangements you intend to make; if not, please give a reason for you decision:

3. If you are aware of any relevant local or national equality or diversity-related consultation, research, or good practice guidance, then please list and attach here

Yes

Compact Guide – A Code of good practice for Black and Minority Ethnic voluntary and community organisations

B. Your Policy, Service or Project

1. What is the main purpose of the policy, service or project?
Funding and support for local voluntary and community organisations

2. List the areas of activity of the policy, service or project e.g. the recruitment strategy might have advertising, interviewing, short listing etc. as activity areas.

Promotion/publicity for grants programmes; advice and support to applicants; assessment of applications; produce reports and recommendations for decision makers; monitor use of grants.

3.Who are the main beneficiaries of the policy?
Local voluntary and community organisations and their members and users

4.Is the policy, service or project corporate and far-reaching?
Maybe

5. In your view, does the policy assist residents in meeting their most basic needs, i.e. shelter and income?
No

6. Will the impact of the policy, service or project potentially be short-lived or lasting?
Lasting

7.Does the policy, service or project deal with delivering front-line services to residents or employees?
No

8. Are you expecting to make any changes to the policy, service or project during the next year?
Maybe

9. Does this policy, service or project potentially have a high impact on Kingston residents or employees?
No

If a high impact is indicated you need to progress to a full EQIA

C. The Impact

1. Complete the following tables using ticks.

Consider the information gathered in Section (a) of this Screening Form, comparing monitoring information with census data, and considering any earlier research or consultations.  You could also look at point 7 (c) of the EQIA Screening Guidance Notes for areas of possible effect:

  • ·Where you think that the policy could have a negative impact on any of the equality target groups, i.e. it could disadvantage them
  • Where you think that the policy could have a positive impact on any of the equality target groups or contribute to promoting equal opportunities, or improving relations within the equality target groups

a)  How will it  impact on men and women e.g. flexible working arrangements might have a positive impact on women with caring responsibilities

Gender   Positive Impact   Neutral Impact   Negative Impact   Reason  
Woman/Girls   Yes       Support women's groups  
Men/Boys     Yes     Do not support any organisations specifically for men  

b)  What type of impact will it have on black and minority ethnic communities use Council services differently, e.g. women from certain minority communities may use the Council’s swimming pool more often if same sex swimming arrangements are in place

Race   Positive Impact   Neutral Impact   Negative Impact   Reason  
Asia or Asian British (including Tamil, Gujarati and Korean)   Yes   Korean     Support organisations in these communities  - at the time of EQIA, not supporting any Korean groups  
Black or Black British   Yes       As above  
Chinese and other   Yes       As above  
White (including Irish)   Yes       As above  

c)  People of different faith such as Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Humanists or Atheist

Race   Positive Impact   Neutral Impact   Negative Impact   Reason  
Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Humanists or Atheist   Yes       Support faith communities although not for promoting religion but for community activities  

d)  What type of impact will it have on people with disabilities, e.g. if information about Council Tax benefits are not made available in large print or alternative formats, access to such benefits might be denied to people with a visual impairment or learning disability.

Disability   Positive Impact   Neutral Impact   Negative Impact   Reason  
Visually Impaired     Yes     Do not fund any organisations in this field – tend to be well resourced from national and public donations  
Hearing Impairment   Yes       Support organisations working with deaf and hearing impaired users  
Physically disabled   Yes       Support organisations working with disabled people  
Learning disability   Yes       Support organisations working with people with learning disabilities  
Mental Health Problme   Yes       Support organisations working with people with mental health issues  

e) Lesbian, gay men and bisexuals

  Positive Impact   Neutral Impact   Negative Impact   Reason  
Lesbian, gay men and bisexuals     Yes     Not currently supporting any gay or lesbian groups  

2 .Considering the results of this initial screening, what is the relevance of this policy, service or project to Kingston’s equality target groups? Also see high impact assessment criteria point 7 (c) of the EQIA Screening Guidance Notes, If a high impact is indicated you need to progress to a full EQIA

Medium

3. Does the policy, service or project have a negative impact on any of the equality target groups? If so, you will need to proceed to a Full Equality Impact Assessment.

No

4. Is progression to a full EQIA required?

No

Criteria for moving on to a full EQIA (if the answer is yes to any of the following questions a full EQIA is required)

  • If the general impact of the policy is side and far reaching
  • If any of our equality target groups are specifically impacted upon by the policy, service or project
  • If a differential impact has been identified on the equality target groups
  • Where a lack of information exists about whether Kingston’s equality target groups have been differentially impacted upon
  • If a negative impact on any of the equality target groups have been identified

Please keep a copy on record to which the public could have full access.  Also e-mail a copy to Johanna Renz, Equalities Advisor and to your Equality Directorate Lead.

Signed (EQIA DIrectorate Lead)
SIgned (Completing Officer)

Date:

Equality Impact Assessment: Action Plan

Please list below any recommendations for action that you plan to take as a result of this EQIA

  • Ensuring that front-line staff regularly attend the Council’s Race and Disability Awareness Training
  • A complete re-think of the way  in which the Service is publicised
  • ·An agreement about future monitoring arrangements

Issue   Action Required   Lead Officer   Time-scale   Resource implications   Comments  
Actively encourage applications from the Korean community   Make contact with Korean Residents Society and any other known community groups and assist to apply for grants for 2005/06   Gillian PenningtonVoluntary Sector Unit   September-October 2004   None – part of Unit’s role   Contact was made with KRS and the London Korean School – two applications were received and two grants awarded with conditions about financial information  
Training in equalities issues   Training in equalities issues for Grants Panel members   Andrew Bessant/Marie Gadsden   Before end of 2005   Part of members’ training programme    

Ethnic monitoring

 
To ensure strategic funded organisations are carrying out ethnic monitoring of users to inform development of services/activities   Gillian Pennington   Autumn 2004   None – part of Unit’s monitoring role   Raised with organisations at annual monitoring visits – follow up with guidance as part of the development of baseline performance indicators  

Accessibility/promotion of grants

 
To review format of guidelines and other information; review publicity with a view to broadening if necessary   Gillian Pennington   Summer 2005   May be some costs associated with larger print or translation   For 2005/06, grants surgeries were held in all four neighbourhoods to allow access for harder to reach groups  

Review Plan

 
    September 2007      

 
Search the Site

The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames, Guildhall, High Street, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 1EU

Contact Us | SMS: 07797 806 521
Emergency Out of Hours: 020 8547 5800